Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... Latest from the trouble prone Queensland branch of the Federales ... Administrative law upsets ... Sandy Street overturned ... On the level in Canberra ... Missing aged care accountant ... Law shop managing director skewered ... Ginger Snatch reports from courtrooms around the nation ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Polly gets a cracker ... The Parrot falls from his bully pulpit … Performances … The end of the Wharf Revue … Bruce McClintock on stage at The Onion Club … Freaks on the loose in Washington ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's Hitlerish ... Reelection of a charlatan ... Republicans take popular vote for the first time in 20 years ... Amnesia ... Trashing a democracy ... Trump and his team of troubled men ... Mainstream media wilts in the eye of the storm ... Depravity, greed and revenge are the new normal ... Roger Fitch files from Washington ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The life, loves, triumphs and disappointments of Frosty Tom Hughes ... 1923-2024 ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

A trial for France ... French teacher beheaded after showing caricatures of Mohammed to the class ... Young student's false claim ends in tragedy ... Misinformation takes off on social media ... Media storm ... Religion infiltrates public life ... Trials unfold ... Hugh Vuillier reports ... Read more >> 

"Over many years, certain journalists employed by Nine (formerly Fairfax) newspapers have been resentful of our client’s prominence as a commentator on many political and cultural issues, and the malicious and concocted allegations giving rise to the imputations constitute a concerted attempt to destroy our client’s reputation. 

Following the Sydney Morning Herald's exposure ... Mark O'Brien, Alan Jones' solicitor, December 12, 2023  ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The great interceptor ... Rugby League ... Dennis Tutty and the try he shouldn't have scored ... Case that changed the face of professional sport ... Growth of the player associations, courtesy of the Barwick High Court ... Free kick ... Restraint of trade ... Braham Dabscheck comments ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Rosenblum v Foreman ... From Justinian's archive ... March 1995 ... When Rupert Rosenblum went to court over a missing house ... Memories of Carol Foreman and her backdated document ... Rocking the foundations of the admin of justice ... Read more ..


 

 

« Immigration lore | Main | Biffo at the bar »
Thursday
Jul142011

Judgment time for Molongolo Supremes

Every unhappy court is unhappy in its own way ... ACT government and Supreme Court in long-running stand off ... Delays and despair ... No rush by CJ to welcome new appointment 

As expected ACT chief magistrate John Burns goes to the territory Supremes when Malcolm Gray retires at the end of this month. 

Two more appointments are to come. 

It's anticipated that magistrate Karen Fryar will get Burns' old gig as Chief Madge, but who will get Gray's job as president of the mighty ACT Court of Appeal? 

This is a hard one for a four person court (Higgins CJ, Richard Roughshagger and Hilary Penfolds-Creme-Sherry, plus new boy Burnsy). 

Ideally, it would be good to have someone who can write a judgment in under two years, which narrows the field quite a bit. 

Numerous sources tell us that unhappiness abounds. Chief Justice Terry Higgins is not meaningfully consulted by the ACT government on judicial appointments, and as for the previous two judicial appointments there were "issues". 

Justice Penfold had been a parliamentary draughtsperson and parliamentary counsel and head of the department of parliamentary services, and not a practising lawyer. 

With Refshauge's appointment in 2008 things got off to a tense start. When he was the ACT DPP he published an annual report in which he indicated there was antipathy from the bench towards his office. 

His appointment came as a surprise to the CJ, as the government had not advised the court in advance. 

It is understood that there was also a similar lack of communication concerning Burns' elevation. 

It is understood that as of five days after his appointment was announced, Terry Higgins had not offered his congratulations to the new judge.   

There was been a long-running stand-off between the court and the government. The judges ask for more resources. The government responds by saying there will be adequate funding when the judges demonstrate they are working to capacity. 

The implication being - knock-off the long lunches. 

Despite his solid credentials, Burns' appointment has not gone down well with some at the local bar 'n' grill. This may be the last judicial appointment in the territory for some time. Opportunities are dwindling. 

*   *   *

Recently we reported a two year gestation for one of Creme-Sherry's judgments, now we've come upon one of Roughshaggers that took three years. Well two days short of three years, to be fair. 

QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Insurance Australia Ltd was heard on March 13, 2008 and the judgment was handed down on March 11, 2011. 

The injured plaintiff lost.  

Justice Refshauge explained: 

"It is extremely regrettable that the busy workload of the court has delayed the delivery of judgment and these reasons for longer than is desirable. Nevertheless, I have carefully read the whole of the transcript and the exhibits that were tendered at the hearing as well as perusing my contemporaneous notes. I found that I had a good recall of the proceedings and the demeanour of Mr Rice as he gave evidence, notwithstanding the passage of time." 

*   *   *

Background

Fryar: in the running to be Chief MadgeBurns has spent more than 20 years as a Canberra madge. Along with Karen Fryar he made an allegation to the attorney general in 2009 that former CM Rapid Ron Cahill had perverted the course of justice.  

This related to one of Canberra long-running judicial sores concerning an assault charge against a prominent ACT citizen and judicial officer, whose name has been suppressed, even though everyone knows who he is. 

Victorian magistrate Peter Lauritsen came up to try the charge against the prominent, but unmentionable, citizen. 

Rapid Ron was a friend of the accused and helpfully provided Lauritsen with what looked like "submissions for the defence": no prior record, involvement in charitable work, and provocation by the victim. He also included a list of relevant cases and a copy of the suppression order. 

Lauritsen had the impression that he was being "got at". Ron's chambers were raided by the coppers and a few days later he resigned. 

A special commission of wise men, James Wood, Jerrold Cripps and Ted Mulligan, who had been instructed to investigate the matter, was disbanded. 

Constable Plod pressed on for another 10 months, but there was not enough in it to satisfy the DPP that he could get a conviction. 

Ron always said that in providing this material to the interstate magistrate he was just keen to make sure the prosecution ran "appropriately". It's easy to see how people might get a confused impression in a small judicial pond. 

Cahill was never charged and the unmentionable citizen had no conviction recorded in his assault case. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.