Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... The justice business ... Appeal admonitions ... Sore bottoms for those lower down the chain of command ... Nationwide lapses ... Perfection proves elusive ... Latest from Ginger Snatch ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Journalism's new poster boy ... Our Julian's long and winding road … Legal quagmire … Espionage Act versus prior restraint of the press … The born-again "journalist" who hates journalism … Establishing a treacherous precedent … Not letting shortcomings swamp the positives ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's too late for the thylacine ... Procrustes closely analyses recent Justinian reports ... The Ippster and Stella Liebeck ... Tort law reform that went beyond the Pale ... In Tassie, no one is allowed to speak for the forests ... Standing up against State rule of the trees ... Where's Syd Shea when you need him? ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Vic's Bar ... Oral history ... Jeff Sher and his famous cases ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Courtroom capers ... Federal Court's digital hiccups ... Principal Registrar in home run ... Pronunciation requirements for names and pre-nominate ... Elocution audit ... Common law shuffle in New South Wales ... Vicki Mole reports ... Read more ... 

"I think it's madness to change it. If you walked into a McDonald's hamburger restaurant and they started serving you seafood, you'd be very confused if you were a customer."

Newington College old boy Peter Thomas arguing against the school admitting female students ... Reported in Guardian Australia, June 21, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The election season ... The case for compulsory voting ... Pity the Brits, French and Americans where politicians have to "get out the vote" ... Nathan Twibill on the advantages of the "median voter" strategy ... Vote early, vote often ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Self-promotion ... Academics scramble to peddle influence with High Court judges ... Government seeks new role for s.18C ... Twenty-one years later, the cheque arrives ... Would you eat at a cafe owned by a Cabinet minister? ... From Justinian's Archive, October 27, 2014 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Balmain girls don't need to cry | Main | Too much testosterone »
Tuesday
Feb282012

Hits of the blitz

Case management regime rolls out at ACT Supremes … Extra money and judge allocated to backlog "blitz" … This month judgment delivered in a case after 39 months cogitation … Exclusive table of long-tail reserved judgments 

One of our field agents has kindly compiled a table of of ACT Supreme Court judgments delivered since July 1 last year (see below). They have all been reserved for six months or more. 

It's an impressive tally. 

The prize was taken by Justice Hilary Penfold, who took 39 months to hammer out her reasons for finding an accused not guilty of indecent assault in a judge alone trial. 

The accused was acquitted on December 16, 2008, but the reasons arrived over three years later on February 8, 2012.  

Justice Richard Refshauge: third placeJustice Penfold also managed to scoop second prize for Maher v Richardson - a delay of 36 months in providing reasons for an order allowing an appeal against conviction.  

In third place was Justice Roughshagger, a comparative Speedy Gonzales, coming in at 33 months for an award of damages in a personal injury case.  

There is another judgment lined-up to be delivered by the court after a rumination period of more than three years. 

The court has announced a "blitz" of civil and criminal trials where cases will be case managed from April. 

Margaret Sidis, a retiree from the NSW Dizzo, have been conscripted as an acting ACT Supremeo to help with the backlog blitz. 

Margaret Sidis: blitz judgeShe joins acting justice John Nield, another Dizzo retiree originally dispatched to Canberra in July 2010, along with Jane Mathews from the NSW Supreme Court.  

There are also a heap of additional ACT judges from the Federal Court, but they are not blitz judges

The ACT government last year allocated $670,000 to fund the blitz. 

The new boy on the court, former chief magistrate John Burns, is used to sausage factory law, and gets through the work pretty smartly. 

It might look bad for the local judges if any arriviste works too quickly. 

Here's the worksheet… 

 

 

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.