Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Appeasement ... Craven backdowns galore … Creative Australia – how to avoid “divisive debates” … Grovels and concealments follow the “Undercover Jew” fiasco … Suppression orders protecting Lattouf terminators … No waves at the Yarts Ministry … Preselection jeopardy for pro-Palestinian pollie … Justice Lee dabbles in “sentient citizenship” … Semites and antisemitism ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...
Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

Pat's wobbly evidence in defamation case ... Remembering the great Pat O'Shane's defamation case against culture warrior Janet (The Planet) Albrechtsen ... Pat comes home at the trial and most of the damages on appeal ... When Fairfax defended Albrechtsen ... From Justinian's Archive, April 15, 2004 ... Read more >>


 

 

« Veneto Verona Vino | Main | Cobras in the courtroom »
Friday
Feb162024

Winners and grinners

Smiling policy for lawyers ... Better coordination required ... When smiling runs amok ... Happy lawyers and glum clients ... Delighted clients and anxious lawyers ... Moments of intense seriousness ... Delirious money shots ... From Justinian's Photographic Editor 

In 2019 Matt Collins KC revealed he has an unofficial policy about smiling. He told the Financial Review, over lunch

"My view is the law is a serious business and coming out of court is a serious business. Barristers shouldn't be smiling when they're captured on camera." 

It was a policy he breached in its observance when his client Rebel Wilson cracked a joke which tickled his fancy. 

For some high profile briefs, grinning happily is the preferred mode, even if the client appears distracted or concerned. 

Not everyone is happy

 

Increasingly in high profile trials, we find beaming clients accompanied by anxious-looking lawyers. 

Should clients look happy if their lawyers' don't?

 

Naturally, there is an irrestible temptation for lawyers with celebrated reputations to lighten up and smile whenever a camera hoves into view.  

Moses on the steps of the court

 

Then, of course, there are those memorable money shots of unbridled joy. 

In the bag

 

Ideally, it is safer if client and counsel both maintain permanent grim expressions. 

The Glums

 

The possibilities are various, which suggests that professional organisations need to hammer out a consistent policy about whether it is appropriate to grin enthusiastically outside court. 

To maintain the pretence of success while proceedings are underway, only to go down in a screaming heap, needs to be avoided. 

 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.