Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Cohn Man ... The ghost of Roy Cohn and the remaking of politics … Cancelling The Apprentice … Anticipatory obedience … NACC Major General’s partially apprehended … Stickler for rectitude … Meretricious sexual services ... Read on ... 

This area does not yet contain any content.
Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


"...eye witness testimony by other witnesses – taking the contempt charge rather than an affirmation or oath – repeated mantra of “no comment” – circumstantial case – assessment of accused’s vulnerability – palpable fear and confusion – satisfactory explanation of absence of adult – a lot happening – other factors militating against admission of evidence – evidence not admissible" 

A lot happening ... Catchword contest ... Entry from Justice Hamill, NSW Supremes ... More >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Vitamin D deficiency ... Anti-vax solicitor birched for "friendly warning" to schools ... Budget measures hit private school fee payers and their personal jets ... Robing room "humour" ... Equality and sensitivity training missing in action ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Crime de filme - the no thrills thriller | Main | Farr and wide »
Monday
Aug012011

Mark Robinson

Sydney barrister Mark Robinson, fresh from important triumphs in the High and full Federal Courts, flops onto our couch, shuts his eyes, and tells all ... There's more to this administrative lawyer than administrative law ... The stuffed zucchini side of his nature is soon apparent 

Think administrative law ... think Mark Robinson.

The Sydney barrister is the author of the famous two-volume loose-leaf doorstop New South Wales Administrative Law

For seven years he was a part-time judicial member of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal, hearing cases on privacy and FOI. 

For 16 years he lectured in admin law at the Universities of Sydney and New South Wales. 

He has argued everything from covert search warrants, bastardisation at the ADFC, domestic slavery, prisoners' rights, to the validity of notices suspending drivers' licences. 

In quick succession he's had two recent, stunning victories. 

He persuaded the High Court to bin former NSW attorney general John Hatzistergos' bikie laws ... and he successfully argued in the full Federal Court that adverse findings against doctors by Medicare tribunals were invalid. 

We found him in a suitably exhilarated state to lure him onto Justinian's couch ... 

Describe yourself in three words. 

Driven. Driven. Driven.

What are you currently reading? 

I am reading "Crooked House" (The Bush Capital Series - Vol 1) by Peter Menadue (2011), Kindle eBook. It is political thriller about a Canberra journalist in big trouble. Peter is a Sydney barrister. 

What's your favourite film?

Ridley Scott's "Blade Runner", 1982. 

Who has been the most influential person in your life? 

John Robinson, my father (in life) and Mason (in my work) - Keith Mason QC, former president of the NSW Court of Appeal; and Sir Anthony Mason, former chief justice of the High Court. I worked with both Masons for several years.  

What is your favourite piece of music? 

"One More Time to Live", The Moody Blues, from the album Every Good Boy Deserves Favour, 1971. 

Mark Robinson in Budapest

What is in your refrigerator? 

Vegetables, yoghurt and more vegetables. From living with two vegetarians and a vegan. No room for steak.

What is your favourite website?

Lawlink. (Sad but true.) 

What is your most recognised talent? 

Arguing. 

What words or phrases do you overuse? 

"Absolutely ... I know ... Do you know?" 

What is your greatest weakness? 

I like my clients and their solicitors, sometimes.

What career would you have liked to pursue if you hadn't become a barrister? 

A journalist in the popular music industry.  

What comfort can we draw from the outcome of your triumph in the High Court bikie-gangs decision, Wainohu v NSW 

That in future the Supreme Court might not be asked by state parliament to do wicked things (such as infringe upon our rights or civil liberties). 

Of the cases you have fought or brought which one makes you proudest?

In 2002, I successfully argued one of the largest administrative law class-actions in the High Court.  I acted for about 6,700 refugee plaintiffs. The case concerned systemic denial of natural justice by the Refugee Review Tribunal - Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal (2002) 76 ALJR 966.

And what about your win last week in the Medicare tribunals' case - what was that all about?  

The lesson there is for ministers to strictly comply with the terms of the enabling legislation, and to do so before building significant Commonwealth organs, such as Medicare disciplinary tribunals that can readily wreak havoc on the lives and reputations of Australian medical practitioners. 

What personal possession would you never surrender? 

My gold (plated) oratory trophy from high school in 1973.

If you were a foodstuff, what would you be? 

A stuffed zucchini. 

What human quality do you most distrust? 

A smile and a handshake.

What would you change about Australia? 

The idea that refugees are evil queue-jumpers.

Whom or what do you consider overrated?

Cable TV and hand-held telephone/computer devices, iPods or iPads. 

What would your epitaph say? 

He came, he saw, he caused some trouble.

What comes into your mind when you shut your eyes and think of the word "law"?

That cute woman with the scales (and the blindfold).

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.