Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Appeasement ... Craven backdowns galore … Creative Australia – how to avoid “divisive debates” … Grovels and concealments follow the “Undercover Jew” fiasco … Suppression orders protecting Lattouf terminators … No waves at the Yarts Ministry … Preselection jeopardy for pro-Palestinian pollie … Justice Lee dabbles in “sentient citizenship” … Semites and antisemitism ... Read on ... 

Destruction of Gaza and Ethnic Cleansing

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate's over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Saints Go Marching In ... Cash cow has to claw its way back to the LCA's inner sanctum ... Stephen Estcourt cleans up in Mercury settlement ... Amex rides two horses in expiring guarantee cases ... Simmo bins the paperwork ... Attorneys General should not come from the solicitors' branch ... Goings On from February 9, 2009 ... Read more >>


 

 

« Launching Eugenia | Main | The war against David Hicks may be over »
Wednesday
Aug152012

Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs

Client meetings versus internal law firm meetings ... Partners revolt against middle management ... Dorothy identifies tell tale signs of a pointless meeting ... Core Competency Going Forward ... Watch out for the compulsory dinner 

IN the morning, just after I have prised open my eyes, I reach for my blackberry.

First I look at the emails which have floated in overnight (messages from recruitment consultants and marketing opportunities from the business development team, which never seems to sleep).

And then I look at my calendar.

There are some client meetings. I quite enjoy going to client meetings and consider them to be my core skill and professional obligation.

They also keep the revenue coming in, which I have observed during my long career is quite important to keeping the business afloat.

But, my calendar is also heavily populated with invitations to Pointless Internal Meetings (PIMs). 

There has been a sharp rise in recent weeks of PIMs. 

It is a consequence of the latest management restructure.

Ivan our middle manager loves restructures. Dreaming them up is what he does for a living. 

Except that this time, there is talk that Ivan may have been - just a little bit - marginalised. 

The coterie of partners he manages has been seriously depleted. (Those partners under his wing who don't suffer from Stockholm syndrome have started to revolt and have secured a spot in another manager's stable.)

Ivan is thus suffering from Relevance Deprivation Syndrome. This has caused him to call a lot of PIMs.

I see three-quarters of my day will be devoted solely to an Ivan-convened PIM, with about 20 attendees - all partners.

Assuming it goes for the full five hours assigned to it in the calendar, that is about $90,000 in otherwise chargeable time. 

Here's how you tell if you are being subjected to a PIM: 

• The agenda and meeting topic will be vague. To find out what the meeting is about you must attend and only then you will find the meeting is about one of three things:

  1. Acts of Impossible Genius performed by the convenor to Further the Firm about which there will be a long speech and, very possibly, a power point presentation;
  2. Gotta Do issues, by which I mean things Ivan tells us we have Gotta Do in order to Further the Firm (get better clients, be number one in the energy and resources sector, have a world leading banking practice, that sort of thing); or
  3. Both of the above.

• While it is never absolutely clear what the PIM is about, you do get a general sense that genuflection in the direction of the convenor of the meeting might be a Core Competency Going Forward;

• Even though there is a general sense of pointlessness at the meeting, nobody has the gumption to leave. In fact, attendees will make some half-hearted contributions about things they Intend to Do, Quite Soon, which vaguely approximate the Gotta Do agenda.

• Invitees are told that attendance is compulsory. Ideally the convenor of the PIM will get someone higher up the management chain to telephone the possibly recalcitrant attendees (e.g. me) to exhort them to attend. I was actually told to cancel my client meeting today. I refused.

• The worst examples of the PIM finish with a compulsory dinner at an exorbitantly expensive restaurant with Ivan and other partners.   

With trepidation, I scroll down the calendar to the evening and groan. Oh God. There is indeed a dinner. 

Another evening trying not to get too drunk while valiantly attempting to keep the evening's sense of camaraderie limping along. This in the face of an endless line of boring stories from the socially challenged.

Don't get me wrong. I share a sort of in-the-trenches empathy with my partners, even the most socially challenged of them. However, a key motivator for marrying my spouse and bearing his children was that we enjoy spending our evenings together, even if the evening only involves spag bog and a bottle of red.

Actually, specially if the evening involves spag bog and a bottle of red. 

Hang it.

I'm not going. 

Dorothy

References (3)

References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
  • Response
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
  • Response
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law
  • Response
    Response: click to read
    Relevance deprivation syndrome and PIMs - Bloggers - Justinian: Australian legal magazine. News on lawyers and the law

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.