Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Appeasement ... Craven backdowns galore … Creative Australia – how to avoid “divisive debates” … Grovels and concealments follow the “Undercover Jew” fiasco … Suppression orders protecting Lattouf terminators … No waves at the Yarts Ministry … Preselection jeopardy for pro-Palestinian pollie … Justice Lee dabbles in “sentient citizenship” … Semites and antisemitism ... Read on ... 

Destruction of Gaza and Ethnic Cleansing

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Live-streaming of court proceedings ... Mortimer CJ struggles with the good and bad ... Open justice is too "maleable" a concept ... More >> 

 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Law n Order in Blighty ... King invites the King for State visit ... Grovels aplenty ... Magistrate's over does the "send him down" ... Musos strike an angry chord about AI encroachment ... Law shops protect the billable hour ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt files ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Saints Go Marching In ... Cash cow has to claw its way back to the LCA's inner sanctum ... Stephen Estcourt cleans up in Mercury settlement ... Amex rides two horses in expiring guarantee cases ... Simmo bins the paperwork ... Attorneys General should not come from the solicitors' branch ... Goings On from February 9, 2009 ... Read more >>


 

 

« A Leagues of their own | Main | Notes from the inside »
Friday
May142010

Goings On ...

Confusion about proposed assault on crown prosecutors’ paypackets … Vic Supremes relent and cough-up excess payments … Pistilli v Atanaskovic shifts to the Court of Chancery … Move over Melbourne Cup – here come the solicitor sponsored Balcaldine goat races

NSW DPP Nicholas Cowdery may have announced his retirement, to take effect next March, but the sniping still goes on.

Attorney General John Hatzistergos recently proposed breaking the nexus between the pay packets of crown prosectors and District Court judges.

At the moment, ordinary crown prosecutors are paid at the rate of 74 percent of a District Court judge’s salary.

Public defenders are in the same boat.

Hatzistergos wrote to his colleague, the Minister for Public Sector Reform John Robertson arguing that prosecutors and defenders on the state’s purse should be paid according to the various scales applicable to legal officers employed in the public service.

His letter claimed that, “much of the work done [by crown prosecutors] does not involve contact with judicial officers”.

Indeed, their tasks are “no different from any other lawyer or legal officer employed by the public service”.

Amazing stuff.

Apparently, this malarky was to form the basis of a review by theStatutory and Other Officers Remuneration Tribunal.

It seemed the attorney general thought crown prosecutors and public defenders should be tossed out of the pay category called “judges, magistrates and related group”.

However, the proposal created such distress among crowns that it has now been taken off the table.

Apparently, it has all been a terrible misunderstanding and the letter to Minister Robertson has been dreadfully misinterpreted.

Phew!

* * *

Talking of distressed paypackets, I hear that the Vic Supremes have capitulated and after much jawboning, many meetings and numerous silken opinions, have decided to give back to the government amounts of dosh to which they were not entitled.

Victorian judges had been overpaid because Attorney General Hulls had accidentally signed certificates pursuant to the Judicial Salaries Act that contained the incorrect date for the commencement of a new schedule of payments.

See Justinian: Whose money?

The overpayments amounted to $500,000.

Most magistrates and County Court judges paid the money back, either as a lump sum or over time.

However, for some odd reason, the Supremes held on to the loot till the bitter end.

Maybe, the thought of being publicly outed made them relent.

* * *

What has happened to the costs from the ill-fated excursion by the Pistilli partners to extract some more cash from Atanaskovic Hartnell?

In March Magistrate Daphne Kok threw out Pistilli and co’s claim that they were diddled out of $30,000 in billings when they left AH because one of the firm’s lawyers didn’t enter his time until after the break-away faction departed.

By the time Daphne delivered judgment a small fortune in fees had been racked-up during earlier rounds in the Supreme and Local courts.

As Magistrate Kok said in her opening burst:

“The plaintiffs are solicitors. The defendants are solicitors. Both parties are or have been separately legally represented. Not only do the proceedings involve too many lawyers, they involve too many experienced and well-informed lawyers …

Far too much time and money has been spent.”

She also knocked back the plaintiffs’ tilt at a costs order for proceedings they said they “needed to commence” to obtain access to copies of the AH financial records, which John Antagonistic said had always been available to them.

There was an attempt at a costs hearing in early April, however it needed to bear a closer resemblance to proceedings in the Court of Chancery and so the matter was adjourned until September 16 “for mention”.

Where?

Manly Local Court.

Let’s hope there’s a lot more life left in this one.

* * *

Attention seeking knows no bounds.

John de Groot from the Brisbane-Sydney wills and estate firm de Groots has announced a $2,000 grant to “create the country’s richest goat race”.

To this end he hired PR man-about-town Tim Allerton to spruik the message.

“We hope the prize money will help revive the century old sport and encourage more people to take it up.”

De Groot has even published a book called Memoirs of a Goat Racer and More.

A three day event was held at Barcaldine earlier this month. The main attraction was the John de Groot Goat Racing Cup.

Says it all.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.