Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Cohn Man ... The ghost of Roy Cohn and the remaking of politics … Cancelling The Apprentice … Anticipatory obedience … NACC Major General’s partially apprehended … Stickler for rectitude … Meretricious sexual services ... Read on ... 

How not to ask law 'n' order questions in the House of Commons ... More >>

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The government wants to publish the secret chapter of the Robodebt Royal Commission ... If someone who is yet to be appointed gives permission ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Vitamin D deficiency ... Anti-vax solicitor birched for "friendly warning" to schools ... Budget measures hit private school fee payers and their personal jets ... Robing room "humour" ... Equality and sensitivity training missing in action ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Mistakes of law or fact are a professional inevitability for judges, tribunal members and administrative decision makers."  

Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, downplaying the Inspector's finding of bias and procedural unfairness with his conflicted involvement in the decision making about Robodebt referrals ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Tobacco wars | Main | Patel trial - what went wrong »
Thursday
Nov292012

Alannah Hill, barrister

Junior Junior is not a lesbian ... She wears pink heels and still wins in the traffic court ... Two types of women barristers ... Both lethal 

I'VE been at the bar for a while now and while the types of male barristers are easily discernable, it took me a little longer to suss out the women. 

I have now decided that there are only two types: the Tough Mudders and the Alannah Hills.

The Tough Mudders are hard-line ball-breaking types - often feminist, sometimes lesbians, and always of the view that there is nothing a man can do that a women cannot do better. 

They tend to be snappy dressers in the usual uniform of black suits and standard blouses.

They are often described as "hard arse bitches" by their opponents and "excellent operators" by their clients.

The Alannah Hills are defined as such by their choice of clothing. 

They appear cute and sweet and are often underestimated by their opponents. 

Don't let the frills fool you - if you cross them they will turn your scrotum into a purse for their spring-summer accessorising.

They are charming and efficient with a side of pink high heel.

Admittedly, a few lady barristers take a leaf out of each book, but most can be slotted into either of these two broad categories. 

Me? ... I am an Alannah Hill.

Early on I appeared at a hearing in the Local Court.

When I arrived my opposing solicitor asked if my barrister was coming. I politely told him that I was the barrister and that my solicitor was the gentleman with me.

He advised that he would let his barrister know that he wasn't needed.

It gets better.

He came back and said, in front of my client, that we had to adjourn the hearing as he needed to get another witness.

I said NO, whereupon he burst into a tirade about how he was being so reasonable with me and I was being pig-headed. 

His adjournment application was downed and despite my defendant client admitting he hit the plaintiff's vehicle in the rear, I managed to get a verdict in our favour.

My opponent stormed out of the courtroom without a word.

A week later he was on the phone booking me for a hearing.

Never underestimate a lady barrister ... even ones in pink heels. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Member Account Required
You must have a member account on this website in order to post comments. Log in to your account to enable posting.