Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... The justice business ... Appeal admonitions ... Sore bottoms for those lower down the chain of command ... Nationwide lapses ... Perfection proves elusive ... Latest from Ginger Snatch ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Journalism's new poster boy ... Our Julian's long and winding road … Legal quagmire … Espionage Act versus prior restraint of the press … The born-again "journalist" who hates journalism … Establishing a treacherous precedent … Not letting shortcomings swamp the positives ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's too late for the thylacine ... Procrustes closely analyses recent Justinian reports ... The Ippster and Stella Liebeck ... Tort law reform that went beyond the Pale ... In Tassie, no one is allowed to speak for the forests ... Standing up against State rule of the trees ... Where's Syd Shea when you need him? ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Vic's Bar ... Oral history ... Jeff Sher and his famous cases ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Courtroom capers ... Federal Court's digital hiccups ... Principal Registrar in home run ... Pronunciation requirements for names and pre-nominate ... Elocution audit ... Common law shuffle in New South Wales ... Vicki Mole reports ... Read more ... 

"I think it's madness to change it. If you walked into a McDonald's hamburger restaurant and they started serving you seafood, you'd be very confused if you were a customer."

Newington College old boy Peter Thomas arguing against the school admitting female students ... Reported in Guardian Australia, June 21, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The election season ... The case for compulsory voting ... Pity the Brits, French and Americans where politicians have to "get out the vote" ... Nathan Twibill on the advantages of the "median voter" strategy ... Vote early, vote often ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Self-promotion ... Academics scramble to peddle influence with High Court judges ... Government seeks new role for s.18C ... Twenty-one years later, the cheque arrives ... Would you eat at a cafe owned by a Cabinet minister? ... From Justinian's Archive, October 27, 2014 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Barristers required to divulge fees for Hong Kong "sittings" | Main | A view from the East »
Monday
Jan302012

News from the broom cupboard

Shake-out of former Keddies' partners at Slater & Gordon … ACT bar breaches suppression order 

A year after the $35 million acquisition of their firm, Russell Keddie and Tony Barakat have departed Slater & Gordon while Scott Roulstone has been shuffled into a special projects broom cupboard. 

This has occured as the three former partners face contempt of court proceedings for allegedly breaching orders not to approach clients who are suing them in the District Court. 

See previous instalment of Goings On …  

Slater & Gordon told Justinian: 

"Tony Barakat has, after considerable reflection, decided to resign his employment with Slater & Gordon." 

There was no expression of sadness at Tony's departure or the great contribution he made to the publicly listed law shop. 

A quick check of the NSW Law Society's web site shows that Tony has fetched-up at something called Barton Lawyers.  

However, there is no listing on the Law Soc registry for a firm of that name. 

S & G's spinner also told us: 

"Scott Roulstone remains employed by Slater & Gordon. He has recently moved on from his position as practice group leader at the Redfern office and will now work from the Sydney office on specific business development projects." 

As for Rustling Russell Keddie, his relationship with S & G ended late last year, after "assisting in the transition". 

There'll be more on Friday after Justice Michael Adams considers the application by the Keddies Kiddies to discharge himself from hearing the contempt case against them. 

*   *   * 

Field agents in Canberra report that just before Christmas the ACT Bar Association issued an alarming and urgent message to members. 

"The CEO and editor of the Bar Bulletin recall the publication issued Friday, 16 December which contained the name of a person under a suppression order. The error was unintended. Please ensure the suppression order is adhered to. 

Attached you will find an amended version of the December 2011 edition."  

No doubt members then busily compared the two editions of the organ to discover the precise details of the breached suppression order. 

It has to be assumed that contempt proceedings will be instituted by the DPP, Jon White, who also authored an article on suspended sentences for the offending issue of the Bulletin. 

If the local bar 'n' grill can't get it right what hope is there for courtroom hacks? 

In fact, the last time the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics analysed the cause of jury discharges it was discovered that prejudice arising from media reporting was the least likely reason for the apple cart to be upset.  

Up the top of the pile of trial aborters were barristers' submissions and judges's summings-up. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.