Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


A biopsy on bias ... Darryl Rangiah and Oscar Wilde … A unity ticket … White flags at Ultimo … The Hyphen … BBC also on the ropes … Cease – FIRE … Why is Murdoch’s bias always wrong about everything? ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Segal Report on combatting antisemitism ... Sweeping recommendations ... In full >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it's the Trump family."

Eric Trump, reported in the Financial Times, June 27, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeitgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Circumlocution Office ... "Reform" of legal fees - four centuries of chicanery ... Tulkinghorn awards prizes for "reforms" that increase legal costs ... Jacking-up revenue by replacing "necessary or proper" costs with "fair and reasonable" costs ... From Justinian's Archive, January 17, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Gruzman never too sick | Main | Hullo sailor »
Saturday
Jan012000

Master of the rope

Lord Denning's nutty lunge for the history books as he unpacks his dark side ... Capital punishment ... Birmingham Six ... Lesbianism  

Denning: had some changes of mind

MY Old friend Tom Denning (Lord to you) has hit the nail on the head about capital punishment.

In August 1990, The Spectator asked him whether it must have felt terrible putting the black cap on his head?

Tom: Not really

Spectator: You had no feeling at all about this?

Tom: Oh, no. There could always be a reprieve if it was a proper case.

Spectator: Nevertheless, were you glad to see the death penalty abolished?

Tom: Not really. It ought to be retained for murder most foul. We shouldn't have all these campaigns to get the Birmingham Six released if they'd been hanged. They'd have been forgotten, and the whole community would be satisfied.

Spectator: But would justice have been satisfied if the wrong men had been hanged?

Tom: (chuckles) No. There is always that danger.

Spectator: If they had hanged the Guildford Four they would have hanged the wrong men wouldn't they?

Tom: No. They'd probably have hanged the right men. Not proved against them, that's all.

And as for homosexuality, Tom wasn't at all enthusiastic.

Spectator: Do you regret the change in laws relating to homosexuality?

Tom: Oh, I don't mind 'em not being in prison, but I hate it being put on a par with other things. And lesbianism ... Oh no! I'm still against it. 

Later (it seems in 1993), Denning changed his mind about capital punishment, maybe too late for some of the punished: 

"Is it right for us, as a society, to do a thing - hang a man - which none of us individually would be prepared to do or even witness? The answer is 'no, not in a civilised society'." 

It's not clear that he changed his mind about homosexuality or lesbianism. 

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.