Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... The justice business ... Appeal admonitions ... Sore bottoms for those lower down the chain of command ... Nationwide lapses ... Perfection proves elusive ... Latest from Ginger Snatch ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


Journalism's new poster boy ... Our Julian's long and winding road … Legal quagmire … Espionage Act versus prior restraint of the press … The born-again "journalist" who hates journalism … Establishing a treacherous precedent … Not letting shortcomings swamp the positives ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's too late for the thylacine ... Procrustes closely analyses recent Justinian reports ... The Ippster and Stella Liebeck ... Tort law reform that went beyond the Pale ... In Tassie, no one is allowed to speak for the forests ... Standing up against State rule of the trees ... Where's Syd Shea when you need him? ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


Vic's Bar ... Oral history ... Jeff Sher and his famous cases ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

Courtroom capers ... Federal Court's digital hiccups ... Principal Registrar in home run ... Pronunciation requirements for names and pre-nominate ... Elocution audit ... Common law shuffle in New South Wales ... Vicki Mole reports ... Read more ... 

"I think it's madness to change it. If you walked into a McDonald's hamburger restaurant and they started serving you seafood, you'd be very confused if you were a customer."

Newington College old boy Peter Thomas arguing against the school admitting female students ... Reported in Guardian Australia, June 21, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The election season ... The case for compulsory voting ... Pity the Brits, French and Americans where politicians have to "get out the vote" ... Nathan Twibill on the advantages of the "median voter" strategy ... Vote early, vote often ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

Self-promotion ... Academics scramble to peddle influence with High Court judges ... Government seeks new role for s.18C ... Twenty-one years later, the cheque arrives ... Would you eat at a cafe owned by a Cabinet minister? ... From Justinian's Archive, October 27, 2014 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Spigelman retirement opens wide field of contenders | Main | Brandis blows hard on proceeds of crime »
Friday
Mar182011

LSB recoups payments from defaulting casino solicitor

Vic Supremo orders hapless former solicitor to compensate the Fidelity Fund for payouts to victims ... When will the indignities cease?

The Vic Supreme Court has ordered former solicitor and gambling addict Gabriel Werden to fork-up $637,000 to the Legal Services Board.

This followers Werden's conviction for tickling the trust account that saddled him with a stretch of porridge.

Justice Breach on Tuesday (March 15) found that Werden, who did not contest the findings relating to 11 breaches of trust, was liable to pay the Legal Services Board, which compensated seven victims of the former solly's defalcations between 1998 and 2001.

In October 2006 Werden was sentenced to five years and 10 months imprisonment (with a three years and four months on the bottom) after having pleaded guilty to various counts of theft, obtaining a financial advantage by deception and having a deficiency in his solicitor's trust account.

This included 11 matters of theft in relation to Mary Soul, Michael Di Pietro, Norrene Johnston, Elias Raji, Michael Semaan, Robert Semaan and Morris Koury.

Beach dismissed the first of the Legal Services Board's claims under s.86 of the Sentencing Act, as the application to re-coup the compo was judged not to be as soon as practicably possible after Werden's conviction.

However, in the breach of trust proceeding the board was successful in obtaining orders for the recovery of $637,343.57 that it had paid following claims by victims on the fidelity fund.

Werden said the proceeding was statute barred, he pleaded laches and that his mother had already paid $350,000 to the claimants.

The court observed that he had offered no substantiating evidence whatsoever.

See judgment

Reporter: Alex Angel-Graham

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.