Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Delay update ... "Extraordinary and excessive" delay - by the litigants ... Contest on costs ... Getting to grips with Qld industrial law takes time ... What is a "worker"? ... What is an "injury"? ... Justice Jenni frigging around ... Slow grind for earnest Circuiteer ... From judges' associate Ginger Snatch ... Read more >>

 

Politics Media Law Society


A biopsy on bias ... Darryl Rangiah and Oscar Wilde … A unity ticket … White flags at Ultimo … The Hyphen … BBC also on the ropes … Cease – FIRE … Why is Murdoch’s bias always wrong about everything? ... Read on >> 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

From the cutting room floor...Handsy Heydon goes to Perth ... Celebrity tour ... Conferenceville ... Dicey's job application speech from 2002 ... Other High Court judges mocked as "vegetables" ... Mason CJ ridiculed ... Speech bowdlerised for public consumption ... Courage of conviction MIA ... From our National Affairs Correspondent ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


The Segal Report on combatting antisemitism ... Sweeping recommendations ... In full >> 

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Sizzling in the Old Dart ... Story of the complaining law graduate ... Tattle Life brought to book ... Beckham family feud over royal gong ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt's postcard ... Read more >> 

"If there’s one family that hasn’t profited off politics, it's the Trump family."

Eric Trump, reported in the Financial Times, June 27, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Zeitgeist litigation ... Matt Collins KC on live-streaming of high-profile trials ... Social media nightmare ... Abuse of barristers ... Chilling emails ... Trials as a form of public entertainment ... Courts sleepwalking into a dangerous zone ... Framework needed to balance competing interests ... Paper delivered to Australian Lawyers Alliance Conference ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Circumlocution Office ... "Reform" of legal fees - four centuries of chicanery ... Tulkinghorn awards prizes for "reforms" that increase legal costs ... Jacking-up revenue by replacing "necessary or proper" costs with "fair and reasonable" costs ... From Justinian's Archive, January 17, 2012 ... Read more >> 


 

 

« Spigelman retirement opens wide field of contenders | Main | Brandis blows hard on proceeds of crime »
Friday
Mar182011

LSB recoups payments from defaulting casino solicitor

Vic Supremo orders hapless former solicitor to compensate the Fidelity Fund for payouts to victims ... When will the indignities cease?

The Vic Supreme Court has ordered former solicitor and gambling addict Gabriel Werden to fork-up $637,000 to the Legal Services Board.

This followers Werden's conviction for tickling the trust account that saddled him with a stretch of porridge.

Justice Breach on Tuesday (March 15) found that Werden, who did not contest the findings relating to 11 breaches of trust, was liable to pay the Legal Services Board, which compensated seven victims of the former solly's defalcations between 1998 and 2001.

In October 2006 Werden was sentenced to five years and 10 months imprisonment (with a three years and four months on the bottom) after having pleaded guilty to various counts of theft, obtaining a financial advantage by deception and having a deficiency in his solicitor's trust account.

This included 11 matters of theft in relation to Mary Soul, Michael Di Pietro, Norrene Johnston, Elias Raji, Michael Semaan, Robert Semaan and Morris Koury.

Beach dismissed the first of the Legal Services Board's claims under s.86 of the Sentencing Act, as the application to re-coup the compo was judged not to be as soon as practicably possible after Werden's conviction.

However, in the breach of trust proceeding the board was successful in obtaining orders for the recovery of $637,343.57 that it had paid following claims by victims on the fidelity fund.

Werden said the proceeding was statute barred, he pleaded laches and that his mother had already paid $350,000 to the claimants.

The court observed that he had offered no substantiating evidence whatsoever.

See judgment

Reporter: Alex Angel-Graham

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.