Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Movement at the station ... Judges messing with the priestly defendants ... Pell-mell ... Elaborate, if eye-glazing, events mark the arrival of the Apple Isle's new CJ ... Slow shuffle at the top of the Federales delayed ... Celebrity fee dispute goes feral ... Dogs allowed in chambers ... Barrister slapped for pro-Hamas Tweets ... India's no rush judgments regime ... Goings on with Theodora ... More >>

Politics Media Law Society


Appeasement ... Craven backdowns galore … Creative Australia – how to avoid “divisive debates” … Grovels and concealments follow the “Undercover Jew” fiasco … Suppression orders protecting Lattouf terminators … No waves at the Yarts Ministry … Preselection jeopardy for pro-Palestinian pollie … Justice Lee dabbles in “sentient citizenship” … Semites and antisemitism ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Rome is burning ... Giorgia Meloni's right-wing populist regime threatens judicial independence ... Moves to strip constitutional independence of La Magistratura ... Judges on the ramparts ... The Osama Almasri affair ... Silvana Olivetti reports ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


 

Sydney Mardi Gras, 2025 ...

Justinian's Bloggers

Letter from London ... T.S Eliot gets it wrong ... Harry cleans up in a fresh round with Murdoch's hacking hacks ... All aboard Rebekah Brooks' "clean ship" ... Windy woman restrained from further flatulent abuse ... Trump claims "sovereign immunity" to skip paying legal costs of £300,000 ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Creative Australia is an advocate for freedom of artistic expression and is not an adjudicator on the interpretation of art. However, the Board believes a prolonged and divisive debate about the 2026 selection outcome poses an unacceptable risk to public support for Australia's artistic community and could undermine our goal of bringing Australians together through art and creativity."

Statement from Creative Australia following its decision to cancel Khaled Sabsabi and curator Michael Dagostino as the creative team to represent Australia at the Venice Biennale 2026, February 13, 2025 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Damien Carrick ... For 23 years Carrick has presented the Law Report on ABC Radio National ... An insight into the man behind the microphone ... Law and media ... Pursuit of the story ... Pressing topics ... Informative guests ... On The Couch ... Read more >> 


Justinian's archive

The Saints Go Marching In ... Cash cow has to claw its way back to the LCA's inner sanctum ... Stephen Estcourt cleans up in Mercury settlement ... Amex rides two horses in expiring guarantee cases ... Simmo bins the paperwork ... Attorneys General should not come from the solicitors' branch ... Goings On from February 9, 2009 ... Read more >>


 

 

« Fancy footwork | Main | Fee, fi, fo, fight »
Tuesday
Oct162012

Drowning, not waving

Cases piling up against Voyager victims' lawyer ... Aged mariners hope the funds are not entirely exhausted ... Solicitor parries for more delay 

VICTORIAN solicitor David Forster, who lost his ticket in December last year, faces another seven disciplinary matters, to be heard by the stipes at VCAT. 

Forster acted for many of the victims of the 1964 Voyager-Melbourne collision. He was put off the track for lack of candour and overcharging clients. He is appealing that decision. 

Forster's law shop had been paid $23 million by the Commonwealth to settle Voyager claims. 

There was a directions hearing last month before tribunal member Rob Davis. Suresh Senathirajah appeared for the LSC and Forster was there for himself. 

The seven matters, relating to seven different clients, variously concern misleading and deceptive conduct, overcharging, carrying out work other than what was contracted for and failure to provide itemised bills. 

The disputed costs in each matter are in the vicinity of $100,000 to $150,000. 

Costs consultants have come up with different assessments, and the tribunal will have to devine which ones are acceptable. 

As with his other appearances, Forster sought a further delay of 120 days before the cases are heard. 

He said he was not ready and that he had "an army" arrayed against him. He estimated that the LSC, the LSB and receivers had racked-up costs of $2.75 million. 

He told the tribunal that one file alone consisted of 20 to 25 boxes and wants access to all of the files and further and better particulars.  

The Legal Services Commissioner called for an expeditious hearing because the saga has dragged on long enough. 

The tribunal pointed out that Forster had not raised these issues at an earlier directions hearing in December last year. 

Tribunal member Davis observed that Forster had a "piecemeal fashion" of filing documents.  

"Everything seems in such a mess ... I have not had submissions put to me like this ... You are a trained lawyer for many years ... All of a sudden you present more letters ... This is a very unsatisfactory way to present them." 

The VCAT timetable has been extended on three previous occasions at Forster's request. 

The tribunal was also critical of the LSB advising that it would file it's experts' reports the following day. 

The hearing has been set down on or after February 4 next year. 

Meanwhile, the Voyager clients are getting older and more frail.

They are holding out in the hope that the funds won't be sucked entirely dry by the time the disciplinary cases and litigation surrounding the receivership of Forster's aptly named law shop, Hollows Lawyers, is exhausted. 

See previous report: Clinging to the wreckage  

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.