Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Judicial shockers ... The justice business ... Appeal admonitions ... Sore bottoms for those lower down the chain of command ... Nationwide lapses ... Perfection proves elusive ... Latest from Ginger Snatch ... Read more ...

Politics Media Law Society


On the defensive ... Exclusive … The zone of hurt feelings … A delicate flower on the Coalition’s macho frontbench … Linda’s Last Chance at the Wild West Saloon … Salving the pain by rehashing ancient history … Uncovering the cover-up ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

It's too late for the thylacine ... Procrustes closely analyses recent Justinian reports ... The Ippster and Stella Liebeck ... Tort law reform that went beyond the Pale ... In Tassie, no one is allowed to speak for the forests ... Standing up against State rule of the trees ... Where's Syd Shea when you need him? ... Read more ... 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian's Bloggers

Courtroom capers ... Federal Court's digital hiccups ... Principal Registrar in home run ... Pronunciation requirements for names and pre-nominate ... Elocution audit ... Common law shuffle in New South Wales ... Vicki Mole reports ... Read more ... 

"I think it's madness to change it. If you walked into a McDonald's hamburger restaurant and they started serving you seafood, you'd be very confused if you were a customer."

Newington College old boy Peter Thomas arguing against the school admitting female students ... Reported in Guardian Australia, June 21, 2024 ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

The election season ... The case for compulsory voting ... Pity the Brits, French and Americans where politicians have to "get out the vote" ... Nathan Twibill on the advantages of the "median voter" strategy ... Vote early, vote often ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

The life, loves, triumphs and disappointments of Tom Hughes KC ... Choice cuts from Ian Hancock's biography of Tom Hughes, A Cab on the Rank ... A painful move from 11 Selborne ... Skyrocketing fees ... Great cases ... Lionel Murphy - "not an easy client" ... Diary observations of judges, barristers and bar etiquette ... From Justinian's Archive, August 11, 2016 ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Fancy footwork | Main | Fee, fi, fo, fight »
Tuesday
Oct162012

Drowning, not waving

Cases piling up against Voyager victims' lawyer ... Aged mariners hope the funds are not entirely exhausted ... Solicitor parries for more delay 

VICTORIAN solicitor David Forster, who lost his ticket in December last year, faces another seven disciplinary matters, to be heard by the stipes at VCAT. 

Forster acted for many of the victims of the 1964 Voyager-Melbourne collision. He was put off the track for lack of candour and overcharging clients. He is appealing that decision. 

Forster's law shop had been paid $23 million by the Commonwealth to settle Voyager claims. 

There was a directions hearing last month before tribunal member Rob Davis. Suresh Senathirajah appeared for the LSC and Forster was there for himself. 

The seven matters, relating to seven different clients, variously concern misleading and deceptive conduct, overcharging, carrying out work other than what was contracted for and failure to provide itemised bills. 

The disputed costs in each matter are in the vicinity of $100,000 to $150,000. 

Costs consultants have come up with different assessments, and the tribunal will have to devine which ones are acceptable. 

As with his other appearances, Forster sought a further delay of 120 days before the cases are heard. 

He said he was not ready and that he had "an army" arrayed against him. He estimated that the LSC, the LSB and receivers had racked-up costs of $2.75 million. 

He told the tribunal that one file alone consisted of 20 to 25 boxes and wants access to all of the files and further and better particulars.  

The Legal Services Commissioner called for an expeditious hearing because the saga has dragged on long enough. 

The tribunal pointed out that Forster had not raised these issues at an earlier directions hearing in December last year. 

Tribunal member Davis observed that Forster had a "piecemeal fashion" of filing documents.  

"Everything seems in such a mess ... I have not had submissions put to me like this ... You are a trained lawyer for many years ... All of a sudden you present more letters ... This is a very unsatisfactory way to present them." 

The VCAT timetable has been extended on three previous occasions at Forster's request. 

The tribunal was also critical of the LSB advising that it would file it's experts' reports the following day. 

The hearing has been set down on or after February 4 next year. 

Meanwhile, the Voyager clients are getting older and more frail.

They are holding out in the hope that the funds won't be sucked entirely dry by the time the disciplinary cases and litigation surrounding the receivership of Forster's aptly named law shop, Hollows Lawyers, is exhausted. 

See previous report: Clinging to the wreckage  

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.