Search
This area does not yet contain any content.
Justinian News

Balkan intrigues ... Old coppers stagger into the Croatian Six inquiry ... 15-year jail terms in 1980 for alleged terrorism ... Miscarriage of justice under review ... Verballing ... Loading-up ... Old fashioned detective "work" ... Evidence so far ... Hamish McDonald reports ... Read more >> 

Politics Media Law Society


Cohn Man ... The ghost of Roy Cohn and the remaking of politics … Cancelling The Apprentice … Anticipatory obedience … NACC Major General’s partially apprehended … Stickler for rectitude … Meretricious sexual services ... Read on ... 

Free Newsletter
Justinian Columnists

Blue sky litigation ... Another costly Lehrmann decision ... One more spin on the never-never ... Arguable appeal discovered in the bowels of the Gazette of Law & Journalism ... Odious litigants ... Could Lee J have got it wrong on the meaning of rape? ... Calpurnia reports from the Defamatorium ... Read more >> 

Blow the whistle

 

News snips ...


At last ... KC baubles for Tasmanian briefs ... Greg Melick can trade in his SC gong from December 1 ... Takeover by monarchist minority ... Tory AG in furious agreement ... Protocol ready to roll ... More >>

Justinian's Bloggers

London Calling ... Vitamin D deficiency ... Anti-vax solicitor birched for "friendly warning" to schools ... Budget measures hit private school fee payers and their personal jets ... Robing room "humour" ... Equality and sensitivity training missing in action ... Floyd Alexander-Hunt reports from Blighty ... Read more >> 

"Calls to produce scalps publicly and promptly are unhelpful."  

Major Gen. Paul Brereton, Commissioner of the National Corruption Concealment Commission, defending his secretive and snail paced agenda ... Speaking in Adelaide at a Public Sector Governance Forum ... November 15, 2024  ... Read more flatulence ... 


Justinian Featurettes

Vale Percy Allan AM ... Obit for friend and fellow-traveller ... Prolific writer on economics and politics ... Public finance guru ... Technocrat with humanity and broad interests ... Theatre ... Animals ... Art ... Read more ... 


Justinian's archive

A triumph for Victorian morality ... Ashton v Pratt ... In the sack with Dick Pratt ... Meretricious sexual services renders contract void on public policy grounds ... Justice Paul Brereton applies curious moral standard ... A whiff of hypocrisy ... Doubtful finding ... Artemus Jones reporting ... From Justinian's Archive, January 24, 2012 ... Who knew the NACC commissioner had strong views on the sanctity of marriage ... Read more ... 


 

 

« Clutz case done in Styles | Main | Mrs Kissel stirs debate on foreign barristers »
Wednesday
Nov102010

Departing judge flings CJ into Rich Hill horse manure 

Justice Bill Wilson saved himself and the NZ judiciary further embarrassment when last month he resigned from the Supreme Court ... On the way out he dumped the country's chief justice Dame Sian Elias in the horse merde

Wilson: insufficient disclosureAcross the watery divide relief has broken out that the NZ Supreme Court's Justice Bill Wilson finally went into the library and shot himself (metaphorically speaking).

Wilson had been successful in judicial review proceedings against a decision of the Judicial Conduct Commissioner to refer his conduct to a Judicial Review Panel for investigation.

The NZ High Court said the JCC was required to start again with more particulars of Wilson's alleged sins.

There were some spirited responses by lawyers to the High Court decision.

All of this arose from the Saxmere v Wool Board litigation, upon which Justinian has reported in loving, yet cruel, detail - including the flurry of faxes between one of the ornaments of the NZ bar, Jim Farmer QC, and retired appeal judge Sir Ted Thomas.

See: The appeal of a silk's purse.

The nub of the allegation was that Wilson had sat on the appeal in which the Wool Board was successful and had not fully disclosed his business relationship in a horse stud and property business with counsel appearing for the appellant, Alan Galbraith QC.

At various points in this vexed story Wilson was found to have owed amounts between $240,000 and $600,000 to Galbraith, largely arising from guarantees that the barrister had made to secure the judge's bank borrowings.

Wilson denied owing Galbraith "a penny". The financial details are murky and the kindest that can be said is that there was a significant imbalance in their respective shareholdings in the company Rich Hill Ltd.

Now that Wilson has hurrumphed off the bench, the matter is closed and there is to be no further investigation into the exact nature of the "imbalance" or "informal expense arrangements" and how little or how much was disclosed to counsel for Saxmere.

Dame Sian: horse playHowever, as a departing gesture Wilson unloaded on Chief Justice Dame Sian Elias.

He disclosed to a journalist on the New Zealand Herald, Deborah Coddington, who also happens to be married to Colin Carruthers QC, who acted for Wilson in the judicial review application, that Elias and her husband Hugh Fletcher also were involved in horse breeding partnerships at Rich Hill and had visited the property several times.

When he was a barrister Wilson appeared before Elias, as did Galbraith. The breeding partnership and Rich Hill were thought not be important enough to be put on the public record.

In providing a platform for Wilson's final salvo, Coddington also helpfully dumped on counsel for the Saxmere interests, Sue Grey, who has been calling for a commission of inquiry into the "wider issues" around Wilson's relationship with the CJ.

Coddington said "Grey is no stranger to issues of conflict".

In 2003 she represented one of the scampi fishers appearing before a select committee of inquiry. She also began a romantic attachment with a Green MP, who had to stand down from the committee after the government department complained.

Five years later, when Grey was a lawyer for the Conservation Department, "she was sacked for conflict of interest because she was also acting for Saxmere".

However, the final swipe should go to Bill Wilson himself, who tried valiantly to narrow the concept of a judicial conflict of interest.

"Let's be absolutely clear," Bill said. "What is a conflict of interest? It is when you have an interest in the outcome of the case."

Nice try.

Why didn't he just recuse himself form sitting, or make an open disclosure to the court, when Galbraith appeared?

Because he had "a duty to sit".

Bill is to become a mediator and arbitrator.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.
Editor Permission Required
You must have editing permission for this entry in order to post comments.